Raymond's Site

Raymond Arsenault

Showing all posts tagged "Raymond Arsenault On Life And Business"

Classic Cars May No Longer Be a Thing of the Past



Original classic cars could become a thing of the past. Of course collectors, enthusiasts and investors will still seek out and cherish the originals, but a new transportation bill was passed this month that will allow old cars to become new again… let me explain. On December 4th, 2015 President Obama signed a new legislation... Read More



The post Classic Cars May No Longer Be a Thing of the Past appeared first on Wilson's Auto Restoration Blog.







via Raymond Arsenault on Life and Business http://raymondarsenault.blogspot.com/2015/12/classic-cars-may-no-longer-be-thing-of.html

Hemmings Find of the Day – 1928 Chevrolet National Utility Coupe







Debuting in January of 1928, Chevrolet’s National Model AB introduced new features like four-wheel brakes, a thermostat, indirect instrument lighting and Alemite fittings to make chassis lubrication easier. Powered by a 171-cu.in. four-cylinder engine rated at 35 horsepower, the Chevrolet National was available in a total of eight body styles, ranging from two-door roadster through four-door imperial landau. This 1928 Chevrolet National Utility Coupe, for sale on Hemmings.com, may be among the nicest remaining examples, especially when the asking price is factored in. Described as in excellent condition with a reupholstered interior, all gauges and lights are said to be functional. The only modern amenity appears to be a six-volt fuel pump, added to make starting a simpler task. From the seller’s description:





Take a long look at this beautiful example of Chevrolet history, this remarkable 87 year young Chevy Utility coupe is in excellent condition. All gages work as they should, speedometer shows just under 36000 miles which I believe to be original. All lights including the stop light works, also the “ahooga” horn. Interior has been re-upholstered, absolutely no rust and the wood is rock solid. Engine compartment is very clean as is the underside of the car. Last year for the 171 cu. in. engine and it runs just like it should. I’ve added a 6 volt fuel pump to help pull the gas from the rear tank to assist in starting. This is a beautiful car for all you “bow tie” lovers.



































Price


$14,900












Location


Hayesville, North Carolina












Availability


Available








Find more Chevrolets for sale on Hemmings.com.







via Raymond Arsenault on Life and Business http://raymondarsenault.blogspot.com/2015/12/hemmings-find-of-day-1928-chevrolet.html

Where wood meets magnificence: Chrysler’s Town and Country nameplate turns 75







1947 Chrysler Town and Country. Photo by David LaChance.



Appropriately, and unlike pretty much every other car, one of the most celebrated nameplates in Chrysler’s history, the Town and Country, originated not with a sketch or a design brief, but with a name that eventually became a car. That nameplate has also proved one of Chrysler’s most versatile and longest lasting, with its 75th anniversary approaching next year.



While credit for the original Chrysler Town and Country goes to then-Chrysler president David Wallace, the name originated with the Boyertown Body Works, as Donald Narus related in his book “Chrysler’s Wonderful Woodie – The Town and Country, 1941-1950.” In 1939, Chrysler had hired Boyertown to build a series of prototype station wagon bodies for Dodge, one of which bore the Town and Country name, inspired by its “town” front and “country” back half. (For posterity’s sake, the other suggested names – Country Club Sport and Country Gentleman – fell by the wayside.)



Boyertown didn’t get the contract for the Dodge station wagon, but the Town and Country name rattled around in Wallace’s head for a while until he decided to build a Chrysler station wagon that would embody that “town and country” dichotomy. So he gathered a number of his engineers together in Chrysler’s Jefferson Avenue plant and worked with them to hammer together a wood-bodied station wagon prototype out of a 121.5-inch wheelbase Windsor chassis, Windsor front clip, a seven-passenger limousine roof, and a couple cords’ worth of white ash and Honduras mahogany.









Archive photographs courtesy Chrysler.









After seven weekends of their own time Wallace and his group turned out a prototype that he then drove to Highland park to show to his bosses, who reportedly had no idea what Wallace was up to. “There was nothing about the lines of this newest Chrysler car to suggest a truck or something makeshift,” Narus wrote. “The finished product was a handsome wagon sedan that, indeed, did follow the line of the steel-bodied sedans.” The board of directors approved and Wallace put the Chrysler Town and Country into production in March 1941 as a mid-model year addition. Pekin Wood Products of Helena, Arkansas, provided the wood parts, Briggs supplied the sheetmetal, and Chrysler assembled it all at the Jefferson Avenue Plant.



While the barrelback bodystyle with the half barn doors garnered plenty of attention when Chrysler first released the Town and Country – the brand’s first station wagon and the first station wagon at all to feature a steel roof – perhaps the most unique feature of the first Town and Country models was the available three-row seating, made possible by a rear seat that slid fore and aft to make room for a center seat that folded down from the back of the front seat. Total production for the 1941 and 1942 model years, which ceased with the intervention of World War II, amounted to 1,997 cars, two of them one-offs built on the 127.5-inch wheelbase chassis.









The Town and Country nameplate continued after the war, but not as a station wagon. Rather, Chrysler developed a number of other bodystyles: a four-door sedan, a two-door sedan, a two-door hardtop, a convertible, and a roadster. Aside from a limited run of seven two-door hardtops, only the four-door sedan and the convertible went into production. As Narus wrote, the postwar Town and Country became a status symbol almost overnight.



“The Hollywood set immediately took to the Town and Country convertible… everybody that was anybody had to have one,” he wrote. “The sedan, while it did not share the glamor of the convertible, was perfectly at home on any of the swank estates of Long Island. If you had a country place in Connecticut and were anybody at all, you surely had a Town and Country sedan to go along with it.”



That heyday lasted until 1948, when Chrysler returned the Town and Country nameplate to its station wagons but retired the wooden bodies for all-steel versions decorated, at first, with ash trim and Di-Noc inserts. It continued as Chrysler’s top-level station wagon on the full-size chassis and what would become the C-body platform over the next few decades, then in 1978 switched to the mid-sized M-body’s LeBaron. Another switch came four years later, when Chrysler applied the Town and Country to its front-wheel-drive K-car, in the process bringing back the Town and Country convertible and the woodgrain trim.



(At one point, the nameplate even graced a Chrysler ute built for the Australian market. How’s that for flexibility?)









For one year only, 1989, the Town and Country nameplate didn’t appear in the Chrysler lineup. It then returned in 1990 as Chrysler’s entry into the then-burgeoning minivan market, where the nameplate has remained ever since. Woodgrain went away fairly early in that run.



Over the years, the pre-1949 wood-bodied Town and Country station wagons, sedans, and convertibles have generated a good amount of praise and gathered a significant following, enough to warrant a chapter of the National Woodie Club and secure their designation as Full Classics by the Classic Car Club of America in 2010.



Chrysler appears to have no plans to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Town and Country nameplate, though it has released a 2016 anniversary edition of the Town and Country minivan that marks 90 years of the Chrysler brand sans Maxwell.







via Raymond Arsenault on Life and Business http://raymondarsenault.blogspot.com/2015/12/where-wood-meets-magnificence-chryslers.html

Judge denies temporary restraining order on National Corvette Museum Motorsport Park







Corvette Museum Motorsport Park in August 2014, prior to garage and pavilion construction. Images courtesy National Corvette Museum.



The National Corvette Museum Motorsport Park is quiet these days, as winter has brought an end to track season, even in Bowling Green, Kentucky. Despite the pause, the conflict between the track and its neighbors on Clark Circle isn’t going away, and as the Bowling Green Daily News (via CorvetteBlogger) reports, a Warren County Circuit Court judge has denied a request from area homeowners for a temporary restraining order on the track.



Though the ruling sounds like good news for motorsport fans, it comes at a cost. To settle the matter once and for all, Judge John Grise stated that the court will hear a jury trial between Clark Circle residents and the track, scheduled for the fall of 2016. In the interim, the track is allowed to continue operations, at least once the season resumes in March of 2016.



In October, the track completed the noise abatement berm called for in the original Binding Elements document. Per National Corvette Museum marketing and communications manager Katie Frassinelli, the facility has also installed Acoustifence, a sound absorbent barrier applied to traditional fencing, at various locations around the track’s property. The park continues to work with a sound engineering company Bowlby & Associates to determine the best solution to the noise complaints of Clark Circle residents.



The jury trial was originally scheduled for March of 2016, but area residents requested additional time to prepare their case, delaying the court date until the fall of 2016. At issue is whether or not the park has violated the “substantial increase” noise standard established by the planning commission when approval was granted for the facility’s construction in 2014. Should the park be found in violation, monetary damages, up to the fair market value of each complainant’s property, can be levied.



The track has another court date in its future as well. On December 10, the track will appeal the $100 per day fine issued by the Warren County Code Enforcement Board, issued due to ongoing operations without a certificate of occupancy. Judge John Brown is expected to rule on whether the conditions for a certificate of occupancy have been met, as well as whether or not the code enforcement board has the authority to issue the fine.







via Raymond Arsenault on Life and Business http://raymondarsenault.blogspot.com/2015/12/judge-denies-temporary-restraining.html

“If the Employees are Upset, it’s Not Really Lean”





How is it that we have two realities out there in healthcare… in parallel, Lean is awesome and Lean is horrible. It depends on where you are, unfortunately.



I had an amazing day yesterday with a major health system… I’ll blog more about them later. I was their guest to see their progress with Lean and continuous improvement (Kaizen).



I saw staff members enthusiastically explaining their continuous improvement approach. Nurses in multiple departments, environmental services, patient transporters. They’re doing A3s and structured problem solving. They’re identifying problems and implementing staff ideas in visual ways.



Staff members are telling management what problems they want or need to fix and they’re being given time to work on things, with the support of coaches. These coaches are their managers and continuous improvement professionals.



The staff members demonstrated a high level of mastery of not just the tools and methodology, but the mindsets, saying things like:





We’re pointing fingers less and looking at the process


We’re testing countermeasures to see if they work


We’re looking for root causes instead of being happy with workarounds


We might not totally solve the problem, but we’ll make it better and come back to try another improvement


We thought we were good until we started studying the process and then we saw how much opportunity we have


They are getting results – shorter patient waiting times, faster call light response, higher patient satisfaction, lower cost… and they’re working to demonstrate and measure the impact on quality and safety.



I think any Lean skeptic would be blown away by the smiles, the enthusiasm, the empowerment, and the patient-centered-ness of this.



So, it was heartbreaking to once again read about the complaints about Lean in the Saskatchewan healthcare system (read previous posts about their problems and controversy).



It’s so confusing, trying to figure out this Saskatchewan situation from afar.



I saw this headline:



Impossible to say if Lean program working: Provincial auditor



I haven’t read the whole report yet, but the CBC article says:





“While some aspects of the government’s multimillion-dollar Lean efficiency program are effective, the provincial auditor says she’s still not getting an answer to her big question — does it work?”





For one, I hope calling Lean an “efficiency program” is the media’s mistake. Lean is about improving flow and quality (just ask Toyota)… better efficiency and lower cost would be end results of meeting those goals.





“Ferguson said there’s evidence that the program is being effectively co-ordinated — but not whether it’s leading to better service, improving things, or getting good value for the money spent.



They’re unable to show us whether or not Lean is achieving what they’re hoping it’s achieving,” Ferguson told reporters.



The auditor had come to similar conclusions in a previous report that looked at Lean in health care.”





Internet reader comments sometimes have to be taken with a grain of salt… and this Saskatchewan situation has becoming a partisan political fight, but look at the comments:





lol…and you wonder why there are high sick days?



lean=stressed out employees, cuts and overworked staff. period





And





Doc here. Can confirm, LEAN is a ridiculous joke. I do not know a single staff member of any level who I have asked, who thinks it doing anything, but it has universally wasted our time and made working more difficult.





And





Does Lean work? Just ask any front line health care worker affected by it, they’re the ones that have to put up with it day in and day out. All those this poster knows of all say it’s a complete wa$te that’s made their all ready difficult jobs (due to the epidemic of under staffing) even more difficult.





And





Most staff were never consulted before the gov’t brought in this private consultant, and if they had it would have been pointed out that many lean-type initiatives that help the workplace run more efficiently were already in place, developed organically through common sense as well as prior continuous improvement initiatives undertaken by management. The consultant never came and said “oh i see you are already doing such and such parts that are already fit into lean”, rather he just said “this is how you do it” and our gov’t and healthcare administrators forced it into hospitals with no regard for the daily effort that staff have already been putting in to making sure their jobs went as smooth as possible.





And





LEAN is just like the ShamWow, big on hype short on results. Obviously the government needs to hire more Vince-like ShamWow communications staff to hype it up. The alternative would be to show these LEAN leach consultants the door and hire some competent managers.





And





LEAN is the only program I have heard of that spends $100 MILLION to save $30 million.



John Black and Associates sure proved that there is a sucker born every minute and that Brad is one of them.





So, how can be it that the hospital I visited yesterday is using Lean (engaging staff) to make work EASIER, while people in Saskatchewan (and some other hospitals, unfortunately) claim that Lean has increased stress and is making work more difficult.



Why are there so many complaints?



Saskatchewan has taken the wrong approach to Lean? It’s too top down? They tried to do too much too fast? Didn’t engage the staff like I saw yesterday?



Does Saskatchewan have a communication problem? They are doing good things, but not communicating it internally or externally?



When Lean is done well, properly, you don’t hear those complaints.



Recently, I heard a Toyota executive say, “If the employees are upset, it’s not really Lean.”



Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment (or click through to the blog if you’re reading via email or RSS).



photo by:



Original article: “If the Employees are Upset, it’s Not Really Lean”.



(c) Mark Graban and Constancy, Inc. 2005-2015



via Raymond Arsenault on Life and Business http://raymondarsenault.blogspot.com/2015/12/if-employees-are-upset-its-not-really.html

A Penny Saved: Many a young person’s personal savings account started with a four-wheeled bank









Banthrico’s 1937 Rolls-Royce; image by the author.





Everyone had a piggy bank. Other than being used to store new-found wealth due to a paper route or other part-time job, it was employed to teach us currency and fractional math. Fortunately not all piggy banks were modeled after the animal. Many a budding auto enthusiasts preferred a small stowage unit that came with four wheels, and for that they sought banking institutions that provided “gift” solutions via a contract with Banthrico, Inc.



The Chicago, Illinois, firm started life as Banker’s Thrift Corporation in 1914. Their core product consisted of small, personal home-use coin banks; one of the notable at the time being the small “book” bank. Shaped and bound like books of the period, it could be “hidden” with relative ease in a bookcase. Small-scale versions of everything from famous politicians to household items, as well as animals and buildings, were part of the firm’s catalog by the time it – along with its subsidiary, Stronghart – was purchased in 1931 by Jerome Aronson and Joseph Eisendrath, who promptly created a new business by shortening the original name to Banthrico (the “I” pronounced as a long E).



Known as “The Coin Bank People,” Banthrico’s staff of roughly 75 highly skilled employees, by all accounts, had crafted over 900 varieties of monetary storage molds through the ensuing decades. Within that list were modes of transportation, including the automobile.



As was the case with most of their products, including the 1937 Rolls-Royce we recently discovered, the autos were hand-cast using white metal (95 percent zinc, five percent aluminum and traces of lead, brass and copper). Molds were poured individually; imperfections were later eliminated through a variety of methods before being sealed in a clear lacquer. The most popular finishes were pewter and antique brass, and each featured a keyed trap door and coin slot on the underside.



Those who remember using the coin banks for their intended purpose will likely also recall tales of lost keys and the ensuing methods used to release cash from captivity. Once damaged, these mobile models were discarded, left on a secluded shelf or hidden in a box in the attic.



Banthrico expanded their product line beyond scale banks: trophies, figurines, bookends and lamps parts were part of their portfolio when purchased by Toystalgia – known for small-scale wooden coin banks – in 1985. Auto bank production continued with the same molds still emblazoned with the Banthrico name. Toystalgia was eventually purchased as well and, in the ensuing years, the remnants of Banthrico survived.



Today many of the original molds, now without the Banthrico name, are used for continued coin bank production by Cutting Edge Industries of Linden, New Jersey, including 98 varieties of autos. They are made on-demand with a minimum production run of 24 per mold.



As for the original Banthrico auto coin banks, depending upon year of production and condition, they can be found for as little as $10 or as high as a few hundred.



This article originally appeared in the June, 2013 issue of Hemmings Motor News.







via Raymond Arsenault on Life and Business http://raymondarsenault.blogspot.com/2015/12/a-penny-saved-many-young-persons.html